Bilimar

Hakkımızda

Bilimsel Araştırmalar ve Stratejik Analizler Merkezi (Bilimar), Türkiye’nin karşılaştığı; siyasi, sosyal, ekonomik Devamı...

HİZMETLERİMİZ

Günlük siyasi ve sosyal gelişmelerin yanı sıra orta ve uzun vadeli yaklaşım gerektiren konularla ilgili kapsamlı Devamı...

VİZYON

Türk bilim hayatına özellikle sosyal bilimler alanında katkıda bulunmak, Türkiye'nin bilimsel çalışmalarda Devamı...

HEDEFLER

1 Haziran 2012 yılında kurulan merkezin ağırlıklı olarak hedefi; uygulanan ya da uygulanması gereken Devamı...

NUCLEAR POWER OF IRAN

 

 

27.05.2013

 

I  will  analyse,  Nuclear  Power  of  Iran.Because  it    is  the  most  important  subject  all  over the  world.EU  countries,USA  and  other  countries interested  in  this  subject.Iran had got peceful aims  in this subject.After  that  this  policy  was changed  by  the  state.

 

 

 

Iran  must  reach  %90  uranium  to  product  nuclear  weapon .It  has  got  %20  uranium.In  addition Iran  used  for civic aims energy  last  years  as  North  Korea  but  it  changed  this policy  day  by day.After  that  USA  and  EU  wanted  to  finish  petroleum  exportation  with  Iran.UN  Security Council  want  to  apply  sanction  to  stop  Nuclear  activity   of  Iran.Because  USA  and  Israel  believe that ‘’It  is big  threaten  our  security.Tahran  should  open  some  nuclear  centrals  to  control  of International  Atomic  Energy  Agency.Because  If  Iran doesn’t   stop  here ,nuclear  weapons  will spread  all  Middle  East.After  that They  believe  that’’Turkey , S.Arabia  and  Egypt  armanent Nuclear  Weapons.After  that   they  want  to  establish  transnational   nuclear  market  and nuclear banks.So  they signed  treaty .Thus  they  don’t  have  nuclear  weapons.So   Complex  deterrence means  this  power  passes  over  of  Turkey.It  is  big  threaten  for  Turkey’s  security.In  addition  USA  want  to  provide  self  security.In  other  words   gulf  countries  and  USA  establish  good relations.If  these nuclear  weapons  get  to  terror  gorups,USA and  it’s supporter  will  discompose from  this  situation.In  addition   Western   countries  have  big  interests  in  this  subject. First  off  all  they  want  to  control  of  energy   transfer.Second  off  all  They  can’t   stand  spreading  of Nuclear  Weapons.Because  they  transfer  second  hand  technology   to   other  countries.USA  want to  break  power  of  Iran  in  the  region.After   that  I  will  explain  begin  doctrine  was  issued  by Israel   which  they  don’t  want  to  have  nuclear  power   of  other  contries .Iran  is obtaining  nuclear  power  to  have  nuclear  immunity  and  pers  civilization.  [1]

 

Iran  has operated   about nuclear power   since 1960.USA and USSR  could  effort   having  influence above Iran.It has got  excellent  geo-strategic position.In addition it has got  a lot of natural sources.Shah  worried  about  communism.Also  he  was supported by  the USA.According  to  first atomic  pile was given  by the USA to Iran in 1967.However  Shah   could effort  establishing   twenty  nuclear centrals  1990s.So Iran started summit with  Germany  and France  in 1974.These summits  convenient  for  interets of France.They want to establish five nuclear  centrals  to  obtain 800 milion tons of  uranium.After that   Shah’s  regime was overturned  by Humeyni’s supporter in 1979.So this treaty didn’t apply here.   Iraq  waged    war against Iran.They  have conflicted  for  nine  years. According to this  treaty  Iran paid  four bilion  francs  to Iran.However Iran  abolished this treaty to start Iran  and Iraq war.So   France  applied to court.After that  Iran gave up one bilion from  it.After  that Western  states would  support of Iran.So Iran established good relations with China ,Russia,North Korea,India,Pakistan.According  to datuum in 2006;Iran has got four nuclear centrals and  nuclear reactors.Accordig to International  Atomic  Energy  Agency’s report;Iran   realized  enrichment  of  uranium in Natanz Nuclear Censtral where ıt takes place North of Iran.It can product  nuclear weapon.In  addition Iran products  deuterium oxide in the Arak nuclear central where it takes place in the Southwest of Iran.It’s name is  plutonium which it is alternative of uranium.In addition Iran product atomic bomb,it will have to need to enrichment  isotope of 235.Iran issued’’We  enriched  164 centrifuge uranium in the  %3.5 proportion.’’It isn’t enough to have Nuclear weapon.Iran must  %90 uranium to product  nuclear weapon.Iran  doen’t product atomic bomb.Iran  want to close Strait Of Hormuz.It  lay to  foundations of Shitee  Empire in Iraq.This  situation will harm to Middle East.I don’t think  writer.Iran can product Nuclear  Weapon.Because  other  states  have got nuclear weapons.International society  must fair in this subject.Because law is universal.In other words same sanctions  must  apply to other states.[2].

 

 

I will expllain economic sorurces of Iran.Petroleum  is  very  important  in the ecomomic and political life of Iran.Nowadays natural gas is as important as for Iran to be strong economically,politically,strategically.Tensions icreased between Russia and Georgia.Energy dependency is effective above political process.Russia excessive use of force against Georgia.However  European states didn’t intervene it.Because they have to buy natural gas from Russia.In addition Iran noticed of this situation which it can effort using for sef-interests. In addition Iran has got 27.5 trillion cubic meters.In addition Russia is the richest country all over the world in this subject.Iran has got natural gas sources both land and sea.Iran isn’t good for natural gas exportation all over the world where Iran has got%1 natural gas exportation.It products 400 million cubic meters daily.It isn’t enough for natural gas  exportation .I will explain some reasons.Domestic consumption icreases in Iran every day.According energy consumption increases in Iran every day.Iran lacks of investment in this subject which it doesn’t allocate resources.According to Iran uses old technology in this subject.After that Tension icrease between Iran and Western countries.Iran sign natural gas treaty with periphery countries.Thus it can effort USA embargo.For example Turkey must buy natural gas to Iran.So It must support natural gas projects.I think  Iran  is obstracted by USA and other western states.Because If  Iran want to continue  nuclear activity,it will  have to need  economic power.In  other words  it must  export  petroleum  and  natural gas to other  countries.

 

I will explain  from BBC News  Middle East’’What does the IAEA report say?

The IAEA has long expressed  concern about Iran's nuclear programme, but its latest report (November 2011) lays out the case in much greater detail than before.

Drawing on evidence provided by more than 10 member states as well as its own information, the IAEA said Iran had carried out activities "relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device".

It said that some of these activities could only be used to develop nuclear weapons - though it did not say that Iran had mastered the process, nor how long it would take Iran to make a bomb.

The report documents alleged Iranian testing of explosives, experiments on detonating a nuclear weapon, and work on weaponisation - the processes by which a device might be adapted and hardened to fit into the nose-section of a missile.

 

There are some allegations that are listed openly for the first time, including the claim that Iran has used computer modelling on the behaviour of a nuclear device.

Previously, the IAEA complained that Tehran had not fully co-operated with its inspectors, though it did say that Iran had displayed "greater transparency" during an inspection visit in August 2011.

In March 2012, it was announced that Iran had agreed to take part in fresh six-party talks and allow IAEA inspectors to visit its key military research site at Parchin, under certain conditions.’’ [3]

 

Iran  doesn’t  worry about  open nuclear centrals. However   this institution doesn’t trust to Iran. Ahmedi  Nejad   criticized   this report. Because   he believes   that’’ They   aren’t   objective   in   this     subject.’’ I think other   states are provoked by USA. Because   If   Iran   has   nuclear weapons, This situation   will  be     big       threaten  for  interests of USA  and  Israel. In addition France   threat to Iran.  Because     it   has   got    big     interests   in   the     Middle     East.  France   was   the first state intervention in Libya   in 2011. However    it   didn’t    support    to USA   about   Iraq. As far as I   remember      Ahmedi  Nejad  said that’’ Israel  remove from   map’’. [4] According   to   UN   apply to some sanctions against Iran to stop nuclear activity. China and  Russia  veto  these sanctions.[5] In addition Turkey and   Brazil     didn’t  approve        these sanctions  Iran  is worry about this subject.  Because    Israel   threat    to  Iran.   I think this situation   will cause war next years. Iran   and   Syria     are supported   by Russia. Because   Russia   can    effort   breaking   power of USA   in the   Middle   East.   The most   important   Russia   has got three   military   bases    in Syria. In   addition    Iran   supported    to Syria  as  Russia. Because   if    Esad’s    government   doesn’t   overturn in Syria.[6] Syria  is  right in  this subject. Because   people    are supported    by Western   states  to   achieve  Middle  East  project. Iran  and  Russia can’t stand  applying   of this project. This   situation    will be harmful for Turkey. Because all middle   east’s   territory   will   break into pieces. Nuclear weapon   is excuse   to achieve their targets. Same politic  applied  in the  Iraq and  Libya. Humanitarian   intervention is   excuse   as  other   methods. Iran and other  states  had  had   nuclear weapons   for a  long  time. As far as I know Saddam  and  Shah was supported  by USA. Shah  was overturned  by the Humeyni’s  supporters in 1979.Thus USA  lost a strategic country  in the Middle East .

 

 

I will explain NPT fourth   condition Don't existing nuclear powers have obligations to get rid of their weapons under the NPT?

Article VI commits them to "pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament". The nuclear powers claim they have done this by reducing their warheads, but critics say they have not really moved towards nuclear disarmament. Critics also argue that the US and UK have broken the treaty by transferring nuclear technology from one to another. The US and UK say that this is not covered by the NPT.’’ [7]

 

 

China, France and Israel  didn’t  sign  this treaty altough  ninety-nine countries  signed  it on 5.March.1970.In addition Turkey and IsraelThey could effort improving their nuclear powers. I will explain first and second  condition of it.According  to first condition  nuclear states  won’t transfer  technology  to other states .Second condition other states won’t sell technology  to  other dtes in this subject.In addition  this treaty was signed by Iran.[8] Iran didn’t obey rules of  this  traety.Because  Shah was supported  by USA. This situation  changed  in 1979 to  emerge Iran Islamic revolution.It  is  harmful  for  USA.As far as I remember states must respond their sovereignty rights.Israel and other states  have  nuclear weapons.However  IAEA  didn’t  apply sanction to them.International law must be same for all states.Because  law  is  universal.

 

 

 

 

 

States must  repond sovereign rights each other.In addition  nuclear acitivity or Iran  was obstracted  by  the western states.It is  unfair situation.Other countries product nuclear weapons.However  they aren’t  controlled  by  IAEA.Nowadays  states  intervene  internal affairs  of other states.Because  international  structure  allow  to it.I will  explain Monroe Doctrine.It was issued  by USA in 1823.According to  European states won’t intervene  internal affairs of America continent.In addition USA  won’t intervene internal affairs of  Euoropean states.[9]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It doesn’t  appropriate to sovereign equality  of states and   principle of non-intervention  principles. States have same rights.In addition  Sovereign equality of states means   they   have  same  responsibilities which it approves second principle in the UN treaty.States won’t intervene  internal affairs of other states.However this situation  changed all over the world.[10] Humanitarian intervention uses to occupy  some  countries.Thus  they  seized  natural  sources of these  countries.  Same situation exist in Iran.Because  it has got a lot of natural sources.However European countries  haven’t got  these sources.First off all they can effort  emerging  perception of threat  about Iran.Second off  they will  be  alone  all over the world.Because  they  have  media  and  other  powers all over the world.Natural gas will important next years for all countires.EU countires  will  have to have  to it. Iran is the most second country all over the world for natural gas.Russia is the richest country all over the world in this subject.USA  and  Western States can’t stand  exporting  of  Iran.Thus it  will loose economic power with economic sanctions.According   to  they  want to be dependent of  Iran  economically.After that  Iran is big barieer to  achieve  their targets.

I will explain ABM teraty.It was signed by  USA and USSR  in  1972.It has sixteen conditions.

‘’

Article I  ‘’

1. Each Party undertakes to limit anti-ballistic missile (ABM) systems and to adopt other measures in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty.

2. Each Party undertakes not to deploy ABM systems for a defense of the territory of its country and not to provide a base for such a defense, and not to deploy ABM systems for defense of an individual region except as provided for in Article III of this Treaty.

Article II

1. For the purpose of this Treaty an ABM system is a system to counter strategic ballistic missiles or their elements in flight trajectory, currently consisting of:

(a) ABM interceptor missiles, which are interceptor missiles constructed and deployed for an ABM role, or of a type tested in an ABM mode;

(b) ABM launchers, which are launchers constructed and deployed for launching ABM interceptor missiles; and

(c) ABM radars, which are radars constructed and deployed for an ABM role, or of a type tested in an ABM mode.

2. The ABM system components listed in paragraph 1 of this Article include those which are:

(a) operational;

(b) under construction;

(c) undergoing testing;

(d) undergoing overhaul, repair or conversion; or

(e) mothballed.

Article III

Each Party undertakes not to deploy ABM systems or their components except that:

(a) within one ABM system deployment area having a radius of one hundred and fifty kilometers and centered on the Partys national capital, a Party may deploy: (1) no more than one hundred ABM launchers and no more than one hundred ABM interceptor missiles at launch sites, and (2) ABM radars within no more than six ABM radar complexes, the area of each complex being circular and having a diameter of no more than three kilometers; and

(b) within one ABM system deployment area having a radius of one hundred and fifty kilometers and containing ICBM silo launchers, a Party may deploy: (1) no more than one hundred ABM launchers and no more than one hundred ABM interceptor missiles at launch sites, (2) two large phased-array ABM radars comparable in potential to corresponding ABM radars operational or under construction on the date of signature of the Treaty in an ABM system deployment area containing ICBM silo launchers, and (3) no more than eighteen ABM radars each having a potential less than the potential of the smaller of the above-mentioned two large phased-array ABM radars.

Article IV

The limitations provided for in Article III shall not apply to ABM systems or their components used for development or testing, and located within current or additionally agreed test ranges. Each Party may have no more than a total of fifteen ABM launchers at test ranges.

Article V

1. Each Party undertakes not to develop, test, or deploy ABM systems or components which are sea-based, air-based, space-based, or mobile land-based.

2. Each Party undertakes not to develop, test or deploy ABM launchers for launching more than one ABM interceptor missile at a time from each launcher, not to modify deployed launchers to provide them with such a capacity, not to develop, test, or deploy automatic or semi-automatic or other similar systems for rapid reload of ABM launchers.

Article VI

To enhance assurance of the effectiveness of the limitations on ABM systems and their components provided by the Treaty, each Party undertakes:

(a) not to give missiles, launchers, or radars, other than ABM interceptor missiles, ABM launchers, or ABM radars, capabilities to counter strategic ballistic missiles or their elements in flight trajectory, and not to test them in an ABM mode; and

(b) not to deploy in the future radars for early warning of strategic ballistic missile attack except at locations along the periphery of its national territory and oriented outward.

Article VII

Subject to the provisions of this Treaty, modernization and replacement of ABM systems or their components may be carried out.

Article VIII

ABM systems or their components in excess of the numbers or outside the areas specified in this Treaty, as well as ABM systems or their components prohibited by this Treaty, shall be destroyed or dismantled under agreed procedures within the shortest possible agreed period of time.

Article IX

To assure the viability and effectiveness of this Treaty, each Party undertakes not to transfer to other States, and not to deploy outside its national territory, ABM systems or their components limited by this Treaty.

Article X

Each Party undertakes not to assume any international obligations which would conflict with this Treaty.

Article XI

The Parties undertake to continue active negotiations for limitations on strategic offensive arms.

Article XII

1. For the purpose of providing assurance or compliance with the provisions of this Treaty, each Party shall use national technical means of verification at its disposal in a manner consistent with generally recognized principles of international law.

2. Each Party undertakes not to interfere with the national technical means of verification of the other Party operating in accordance with paragraph 1 of this Article.

3. Each Party undertakes not to use deliberate concealment measures which impede verification by national technical means of compliance with the provisions of this Treaty. This obligation shall not require changes in current construction, assembly, conversion, or overhaul practices.

Article XIII

1. To promote the objectives and implementation of the provisions of this Treaty, the Parties shall establish promptly a Standing Consultative Commission, within the framework of which they will:

(a) consider questions concerning compliance with the obligations assumed and related situations which may be considered ambiguous;

(b) provide on a voluntary basis such information as either Party considers necessary to assure confidence in compliance with the obligations assumed;

(c) consider questions involving unintended interference with national technical means of verification;

(d) consider possible changes in the strategic situation which have a bearing on the provisions of this Treaty;

(e) agree upon procedures and dates for destruction or dismantling of ABM systems or their components in cases provided for by the provisions of this Treaty;

(f) consider, as appropriate, possible proposals for further increasing the viability of this Treaty; including proposals for amendments in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty;

(g) consider, as appropriate, proposals for further measures aimed at limiting strategic arms.

2. The Parties through consultation shall establish, and may amend as appropriate, Regulations for the Standing Consultative Commission governing procedures, composition and other relevant matters.

Article XIV

1. Each Party may propose amendments to this Treaty. Agreed amendments shall enter into force in accordance with the procedures governing the entry into force of this Treaty.

2. Five years after entry into force of this Treaty, and at five-year intervals thereafter, the Parties shall together conduct a review of this Treaty.

Article XV

1. This Treaty shall be of unlimited duration.

2. Each Party shall, in exercising its national sovereignty, have the right to withdraw from this Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events related to the subject matter of this Treaty have jeopardized its supreme interests. It shall give notice of its decision to the other Party six months prior to withdrawal from the Treaty. Such notice shall include a statement of the extraordinary events the notifying Party regards as having jeopardized its supreme interests.

Article XVI

1. This Treaty shall be subject to  ratification  in  accordance with the constitutional procedures of each Party. The Treaty shall enter into force on the day of the exchange of instruments of ratification.

2. This Treaty shall be registered pursuant to Article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.[11]

 

 

In conclusion I believe that Iran isn’t  right to improve  Nuclear programme.NPT  was signed by Iran in this term.So It must obey  rules of  NPT.Because  it doesn’t security  for  us.Missile shield project  is applied by them to protect of  Israel in the war.Turkey  must protect balances in the region.Because it  will be harmful for us.In addition We  must improve economic  relations with them.Because  they export natural gas.This dependency will continue next years.We  export other with them.Economic,political and  cultural relations  have to be strong with neighbours.It is very important for  security ,economy.In addition,we  must  have  had  good  relations with Western contries.If  we support Iran or USA,this condition will clash  with our  national interests. These treaties was signed by the states to protect national peace.So they must obey rules of these treaties.Especially Turkey,Iran,Syria and Israel must regard it.Iran must stop nuclear activites.Because nuclear weapons are  big threaten for humanty.Israel and Iran must solve this problem with negotiation.In addition UN mmust have been active policy in this subject.According to Turkey doesn’t allow to this nuclear programme of Iran.Because Iran is neighbour.The most important Nuclear weapon will cause regional power of Iran..

 

 

OĞUZ TANER HACIFAZLIOĞLU

 

 

 

 

 


[1] .  Prof.DR.Nurşin ATEŞOĞLU GÜNEY 28.July.2012  Seminar Nuclear Energy and Turkey

[2] http://www.avrasyabir.org/2012/01/iran-ve-nukleer-enerji/ Date Of access:14.Jan.2013

[3] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11709428,  http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/planet/19197483.asp Access of date:19.Jan.2013

[4] http://www.gazete5.com/haber/israil-haritadan-silinir-4638.htm Access of date:19.Jan.2013

[5] http://www.rusya.ru/Content/5851-Rusya+ve+%C3%87in__8217;den+%C4%B0ran+karar%C4%B1na+veto Access of date:19.Jan.2013

[6] http://www.heg.gen.tr/haber/1485/iranin-suriyeyi-destekleme-nedenleri.html Access of date:19.Jan.2013

[7] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-11709428 Access of date:19.Jan.2013

[8] Tayyar ARI  International Relations and  Foreign Policy  ninth edition Page:603.

[9] http://iskenderkarakaya.wordpress.com/uluslararasi-iliskiler-sozlugu-2/uluslararasi-politika/uluslararasi-politika-1/   Date of Access :23.Jan.2013

[10]  Hüseyin PAZARCI  International  Law sixth edition page 150-151.

[11] http://www.state.gov/www/global/arms/treaties/abm/abm2.html Siteye Erişim Tarihi:22.05.2013

Yorum göndermek için lütfen giriş yapın.